Sunday, May 7, 2017

Transliteration: A Literary Tool

The most important thing to remember about any translation process, is that it cannot be performed without interpretation.  Which means, translation always carries the opinion of the translator.

When translating from one language into another language, such as Greek into English, there are at least three different tools that can be applied.

1)  Translation
2)  Interpretation
3)  Transliteration


Translation is the processes of converting a word of one language into the corresponding word in another language.  This rarely works perfectly as there are concepts and ideas expressed by a word in a given language that cannot be adequately expressed by a word in another language.  When I was cutting my Christian Teeth in the Southern Baptist Convention, I was taught - with no doubt what-so-ever - the the KJB was a "word for word translation."  Imagine my dismay (and embarrassment of naivety) when years later, I learned differently.  I discovered that there are ideas, expressions and syntax in Hebrew and Greek that simply cannot be expressed word-for-word in English.  In those instances, another tool is used: interpretation.


Interpretation is used with translation to convey the underlying idea of a word or sentence in a given language into their equivalent idea in a target language.  This is performed by applying various corollary ideas and constructs in order to properly express the original idea.  If however, this translation and interpretation process becomes overly cumbersome, we may use another tool called transliteration.


There are three reasons why transliteration would be used
  1. When there is no useful word in the target language that conveys the same meaning 
  2. When repetitive interpretation would be too cumbersome for the literary context 
  3. When the translator wants to hide the actual meaning of the word.
Transliteration is the process of converting a word in a source language into a new word in the target language by either transposing letter-for-letter between the two languages, or transposing sound-for-sound between the two languages.  In either case, a new word is created in the target language.  Since a new word is constructed, its definition must be provided by the translator.  Once defined, the word can be used to convey the original intent and idea without re-interpretation and translation.

Whether you realize it or not, a number of traditional New Testament doctrines survive as you know them only because of transliteration.


Depending upon your denominational bent, baptize either means sprinkling water upon someone, or it means immersing someone completely.  But did you know that baptize is a transliteration, not a translation, not an interpretation?  The interpretation, or definition of the Greek "baptizō" (bap-tid'-zo) is to make fully wet.  The appropriate translation is immerse.  Therefore, John the Baptist was actually known as John the Immerser.  When we realize that the traditionally correct method of baptism in the Catholic church (Reformed or not) was sprinkling, then we understand why the transliteration was provided, and why its definition was provided outside of scripture.


In the KJB, the word "deacon", in its various forms, is found 5 times.  It is transliterated from "diakonos" and "diakoneō".  But did you also know that these two forms alone are collectively found 67 times in the New Testament?  These two words are translated as follows:
  • minister
  • servant
  • to be ministered unto
  • serve
  • administer
Did you further know that Paul considered himself a deacon?
What then is Apollos? And what is Paul? Servants (diakonosthrough whom you believed, even as the Lord gave opportunity to each one. (1 Cor. 3:5 [NASB])
Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers (diakonosby whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man? (1 Cor. 3:5 [KJV])
Therefore, when you see transliteration without definition, you should consider that a huge red flag. 

What the translators did, when providing a transliteration for deacon, was to hide the meaning of the word in order to support an organizational structure within a state sanctioned and controlled institution.  Essentially, they helped propitiate the office of the deacon where non existed.

But what about 1 Timothy 3:13? 
 For they that have used the office of a deacon well purchase to themselves a good degree, and great boldness in the faith which is in Christ Jesus.
If you consider the interlinear version of that passage, you will hardly recognize it.  Word-for-word, it reads as follows [words added for clarity]:
those indeed well having served a standing for themselves good acquire and great confidence in [the] faith that [is] in Christ Jesus.

The KJV translators took such liberty with this section of scripture, that the Greek word for office (praxis) - which means a practice, deed or work - is not even found in this section.

The point is to not take things at face value.  Dig in and discover for yourself what is actually there, or not there.

Further Study

Other words you might find interesting to study:


  • Using the surrounding context of scripture, discover how many apostles are mentioned or referred to in the New Testament.


  • How has our doctrine of angels been influence and/or established by transliteration?

No comments:

What is your Meta-Narrative?

\ ˈme-tə - ner-ə-tiv' \ - Concerning or providing information about members of its own category. All of us have a pre-disposed na...